Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It really is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not supplied her more than enough notice before raising her rent, citing a brand new state legislation that requires a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
Also, it may review an appeal of a decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts In the event the Commission cannot arrive at a decision.
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Within the United States, folks are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember a person rule of thumb when it involves referring to case legislation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only into the case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may well exist conflicts between the different lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually nicely-settled that though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the benefit of all of the suitable candidates and after check here because of deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of eligible candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part in the respondent department.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. As a result, this petition is admissible based on recognized court precedents, and the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
10. Based on the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition is not deemed maintainable which is therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of legislation.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is usually a effectively-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.